In an era where keyless entry systems have become a standard feature across modern vehicles, concerns around relay theft – where criminals exploit vulnerabilities in keyfob signals to gain unauthorised access – have grown exponentially. The FIREDOG Faraday Pouch emerges as a practical countermeasure, designed to block wireless signals from car keyfobs when not in use. This evaluation examines its technical capabilities and real-world performance through the lens of automotive security essentials.
Constructed from a triple-layer shielded fabric combining copper and nickel alloys, the pouch employs Faraday cage principles to disrupt electromagnetic fields. Independent laboratory tests confirm its ability to block frequencies between 200MHz-20GHz, effectively neutralising signals used by common keyless entry systems operating at 315MHz (common in US/Asian models) and 433.92MHz (prevalent in European vehicles). The 10.5cm x 7.5cm dimensions accommodate bulky modern fobs, with users noting it comfortably fits BMW display keys and Mercedes-Benz flip-style units without straining the magnetic clasp closure.
Practical considerations for daily use reveal thoughtful design elements. The 180-degree fold-over closure mechanism – praised by multiple users for its “positive snap action that feels secure” – creates overlapping shielded layers. An integrated carabiner clip addresses portability concerns, allowing attachment to belts or handbags while maintaining the pouch’s orientation-dependent shielding integrity. Motorists appreciate the high-visibility green colour option for reducing misplacement risks in cluttered environments.
Performance under real-world conditions shows mixed but generally positive results. Numerous users report complete signal blocking during controlled tests with Audi, Land Rover, and Volkswagen vehicles, stating their cars remained “completely unresponsive” to locked-in fobs. However, some note the importance of proper orientation, with one Range Rover owner observing that “angling the pouch vertically in a jacket pocket sometimes allows minimal signal leakage”. FIREDOG’s recommendation for periodic shielding efficacy checks using in-car proximity sensors aligns with industry best practices for Faraday products.
Durability testing suggests the polyester outer layer resists abrasion from daily carry, though long-term wear patterns on the metallic inner coating remain to be seen. The anti-static lining receives particular praise from Tesla owners, who value its protection for touch-sensitive keycards. Maintenance considerations include hand-washing instructions – a noted limitation compared to machine-washable competitors, though most users consider this a minor trade-off for the product’s shielding reliability.
Environmental resistance meets basic requirements, with the water-resistant exterior repelling light rain showers. However, users in extreme climates advise against prolonged exposure to moisture, as one Volvo driver in Scotland noted: “Heavy downpours eventually seep through the stitching during hillwalking trips”. This highlights the product’s suitability for urban use over rugged outdoor adventures.
Compatibility extends beyond automotive applications, with cyclists and smart home enthusiasts repurposing the pouch for protecting RFID-enabled devices. A Ducati owner mentioned successfully blocking their motorcycle’s keyless ignition system, while a smart lock user appreciated the “added security layer for home automation fobs”.
The FIREDOG Faraday Pouch positions itself as a cost-effective security measure in vehicle protection ecosystems. While not substituting for comprehensive anti-theft systems, its targeted signal-blocking functionality provides measurable protection against relay attacks. Automotive security experts recommend pairing such pouches with steering locks and GPS trackers for multi-layered defence – an approach echoed by users who describe it as “an essential first line of defence in modern vehicle security”. For motorists prioritising straightforward, portable protection against evolving digital theft methods, this solution warrants serious consideration despite minor ergonomic compromises.














































